References for 11-14-05 Powerpoint Presentation at Mealey's LexisNexis Conference
Silicosis: Medical Aspects

Click here for the Powerpoint slides

Lawrence Martin, M.D.
larry.martin@adelphia.net

(* most highly recommended for each section)

 

Silicosis - Diagnosis, prevalence and medical management

*    www.uptodate.com (“Silicosis”)

 

*    Silicosis Mortality, Prevention, and Control --- United States, 1968--2002. MMWR Weekly, 54:410-405, April 29, 2005. www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5416a2.htm

 

*    Beckett W, et. al. ATS Guidelines: Adverse effects of crystalline silica exposure. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1997;155:761-765.


www.emedicine.com (“Silicosis”)


Banks, DE, Balaan, M, Wang, ML. Silicosis in the 1990s, revisited. Chest 1997; 111:837.


Rosenman, KD, Reilly, MJ, Kalinowski, DJ, Watt, FC. Silicosis in the 1990s. Chest 1997; 111:779.

 

Hertzberg, VS, Rosenman, KD, Reilly, MJ, Rice, CH. Effect of occupational silica exposure on pulmonary function. Chest 2002; 122:721.

 

Rosenman, KD, Reilly, MJ, Henneberger, PK. Estimating the total number of newly-recognized silicosis cases in the United States. Am J Ind Med 2003; 44:141.

 

Silica MDL cases

*   Jack, Judge Janis. In re Silica Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1553, 2005 WL 1593936 (S.D. Tex. June 10, 2005). 

 

*   Parloff R. Diagnosing for Dollars. Fortune, June 13, 2005; 97-110.

 

*   Glater, Jonathan D. The Tort Wars, at a Turning Point. New York Times, Sunday, October 9, 2005.

 

Curran E. Doctor’s testimony ignites legal storm. Mobile Register, March 13, 2005.

 

Wall Street Journal editorial: The Silicosis Sheriff, July 14, 2005.

Wall Street Journal editorial: Silicosis Scandal, August 12, 2005.
Available at www.wsj.com

 

Asbestos screening experience relevant to silica MDL cases

 

*    Brickman L: On the Theory Class’s Theories of asbestos litigation: Disconnect between scholarship and reality. Pepperdine Law Review, Volume 31, No. 1, 2004; 33-170.

 

*    Brickman L. Ethical Issues in Asbestos Litigation. Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 33, pp. 833-912, 2005.

 

*    Bernstein DB. Keeping junk science out of asbestos litigation. Pepperdine Law Review, Volume 31, No. 1, 2004; 11-28.

Brickman L: The Great Asbestos Swindle. Wall Street Journal, January 6, 2003; p. A18.

 

Brickman L: Testimony before United States Committee on the Judiciary. Asbestos: Mixed Dust and FELA Issues. February 2, 2005.

 

Gitlin JN, Cook LL, Linton OW, Garrett-Mayer E. Comparison of B-readers’ interpretations of chest radiographs for asbestos related changes. Academic Radiology 2004;11:843-856. Abstract available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query (Enter ‘Gitlin, Cook’ to retrieve abstract).

 

Janower ML, Berlin L. “B” Readers’ Radiographic interpretations in asbestos litigation: Is something rotten in the courtroom? Acad Radiol 2004;11:841-842.

 

Jensen RL, Crapo RO. Pulmonary function data used in asbestos claims and litigation have problems. American Thoracic Society Vol 2 (2005): 33A. Abstracts Issue. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. ATS 2005 International Conference, San Diego, 22 May 2005.

 

Martin L. 2004 Asbestos Disease Guidelines Ignore Mass Screening Abuse. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2005;171:665.

 

Martin L. The 2004 ATS Statement on Asbestos Disease Diagnosis: Scientific and Ethical Problems. Mealey's Litigation Report: Asbestos. LexisNexis, Vol 20, No. 7, May 4, 2005. Available at www.lakesidepress.com/Asbestos/ATS-2004Statement-rebuttal.pdf

 

End of References