Chapter 8, cont… (Page 4)

Pulmonary circulation

PAWP as a guide to left heart filling pressures. The relationship of PAWP to left heart hemodynamics is a complex one. This relationship can be simplified somewhat by examining the relationship between PAWP and left atrial pressure (LAP), left ventricular end­diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and left ventricular end­diastolic volume (LVEDV), which is a critical determinant of left ventricular function.

PAWP measurement would be most useful if the following were always true: (1) PAWP equals LAP equals LVEDP; and (2) LVEDP accurately reflects LVEDV so that an increase or a decrease in LVEDV proportionately changes LVEDP.

These ideal conditions are often assumed to be present during hemodynamic measurement, but in unhealthy patients they may not hold. Chronologic review of the Swan­Ganz literature reveals increasing sophistication in the understanding of this fact plus a better appreciation of the possible pitfalls in interpreting PAWP measurement.

Generally there is good correlation between PAWP and LAP, even in patients with heart disease, including those who have mitral stenosis. The difficulty arises in the correlation between PAWP and LVEDP. Before discussing this correlation, we will examine why it is important to know the LVEDP.

During diastole, blood from the left atrium flows past the mitral valve to fill the left ventricle. The more the myocardium is stretched, the more the blood volume that is ejected during systole increases. The degree of myocardial stretch at the end of diastole is often referred to as preload; with increasing preload, up to a point, the work produced by the myocardium (left ventricular stroke work) increases. This relationship is the essence of Starling's law of the heart (Fig. 8­12).

The degree of myocardial stretch is usually measured in vitro on isolated muscle preparations. In vivo, the degree of stretch correlates with the left ventricular end­diastolic volume (LVEDV). According to Starling's law, LVEDV is the left ventricular preload and bears the same relationship to left ventricular stroke work as does the degree of myocardial muscle stretch.

Stroke volume can also be substituted for left ventricular stroke work. Thus in vivo, Starling's law of the heart relates LVEDV to stroke volume ( Fig. 8­13)­­the higher the LVEDV (up to a point), the higher the stroke volume. Since cardiac output is the stroke volume times the heart rate, at a constant heart rate the same Starling relationship exists for LVEDV vs. cardiac output.

Shifts of the Starling curve can occur as a result of anything that alters myocardial contractility; the curve can be shifted to the left (increased contractility, as may occur from inotropic drugs) or to the right (decreased contractility, as may occur from myocardial infarction). A Starling curve shifted to the left will have an increased cardiac output for a given LVEDV; a curve shifted to the right will have a decreased cardiac output for a given LVEDV (Fig. 8­13).

Figure 8-12

Fig. 8­12. The Starling curve relates the degree of myocardial stretch (measured as end­diastolic fiber length) to the degree of muscle work (left ventricular stroke work). The former is the preload of the left ventricle and, in vivo, correlates with the left ventricular enddiastolic volume.

Starling's law is often reinterpreted to relate left ventricular end­diastolic pressure (LVEDP) to cardiac output (Fig. 8­13). LVEDP is the "filling pressure" of the left ventricle, i.e., the left ventricular pressure at the end of diastole. As the filling pressure increases (presumably reflecting filling volume), cardiac output increases, again up to a point. If this relationship is true and if PAWP accurately reflects LVEDP, PAWP can then be used as a measure of left ventricular preload. As a measure of preload, PAWP can serve as a valuable guide to therapy.

Figure 8-13

Fig. 8­13. The Starling curve in clinical practice. In clinical practice the stroke volume (or cardiac output) is used in place of left ventricular stroke work, and the left ventricular end­diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is used in place of left ventricular end­diastolic volume (LVEDV). This reinterpretation of the Starling curve allows pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) to serve as the basic measurement of left ventricular preload on the assumption that PAWP equals LVEDP and that LVEDP accurately reflects LVEDV. Changes in myocardial contractility affect the quantitative relationship between preload and stroke volume. The middle curve represents the normal relationship. Changes in contractility of the myocardium can displace the Starling curve to the left (increased contractility) or to the right (decreased contractility) .

Figure 8-14 A
Figure 8-14 B

Fig. 8­14. Left ventricular compliance curve­­LVEDV vs. LVEDP. A, Idealized ventricular compliance curve a linear function. The same change in pressure at an part of the straight line reflects the same change in volume. B, Actual ventricular compliance curve, a curvilinear function. The same change in pressure at different parts of the curve reflects a different change in volume

Clinical problem 7
Two patients have reduced urine output and systemic hypotension. Assuming their problem is caused by hemodynamic instability, how would you manage each patient based on the following information?

Patient A. PAWP, 4 mm Hg

Patient B. PAWP, 28 mm Hg

In many cases PAWP accurately reflects left ventricular filling pressure (LVEDP) and can be used as a guide to patient management. However, the relation between LVEDP and LVEDV is not a straight line (Fig. 8­14, A) but instead is curvilinear (Fig. 8­14, B). Ventricular compliance is the change in volume (LVEDV) per the change in distending pressure (LVEDP). Because this relationship is not linear, a change in LVEDP (and hence PAWP) cannot be assumed to reflect accurately a change in ventricular preload; in Fig. 8­14, B, a small pressure change in the ascending limb of the curve reflects the same volume change as does a large pressure change near the top of the curve. Furthermore, ventricular compliance curves are greatly altered with heart disease so that relationships between pressure and volume can be even more distorted; in the low­compliant, stiff left ventricle, a high LVEDP may actually reflect a relatively small LVEDV.

Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) can also affect ventricular compliance by increasing the intrathoracic pressure so that the pressure surrounding the left ventricle is increased. This effect is similar to the one PEEP has on elevating PAWP. Normally, at end­exhalation, the thoracic pressure surrounding the left ventricle is at, or close to, atmospheric pressure (zero). With PEEP this surrounding pressure may be positive (above atmospheric). As a result, a higher than normal LVEDP will be required to achieve a given ventricular volume, and the ventricle's compliance will be reduced. Fig. 8­15 shows how changes in left ventricular preload may not be reflected in the LVEDP.

In summary, there are several situations where PAWP may not reflect the true preload (LVEDV) of the left ventricle. These situations are summarized in the box on p. 170. Obviously, the true relationship of PAWP (as measured with the Swan-Ganz catheter) and the left ventricular preload is a complex one, especially when the patient is receiving artificial ventilation or when there is altered left ventricular compliance. There is no easy way to account for the multitude of factors listed in the box except to follow the patient closely, gauging changes in cardiac output, oxygenation, and urine output with changes in wedge pressure. PAWP is another, albeit important, measurement, that should never substitute for intelligent clinical assessment of the patient.

Figure 8-15

Fig. 8­15. The pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) reflects left ventricular end­diastolic pressure (LVEDP), but LVEDP may not accurately reflect left ventricular preload. The relationship is shown of the PAWP to the left ventricular preload (left ventricular volume) in three situations. In each situation PAWP is elevated to 25 mm Hg and accurately reflects an LVEDP of 25 mm Hg. A, The cause of the PAWP elevation is increased pleural pressure ( + 10 mm Hg), which might occur from positive end­expiratory pressure (PEEP) therapy. The increased pleural pressure adds to the LVEDP and is therefore reflected in the PAWP. However, the true left ventricular preload (left ventricular volume) is normal. B, The cause of PAWP elevation is an elevated left ventricular volume; pleural pressure is normal at­­5 mm Hg. Thus PAWP accurately reflects an elevated left ventricular preload. C, The cause of PAWP elevation is a stiff left ventricle, which might occur from myocardial ischemia. PAWP and pleural pressure are the same as in B, and left ventricular preload (left ventricular volume) is normal. (Modified from O'Quin, R., and Marini, J.J.: Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 128:320, 1983.)

SITUATIONS WHERE PAWP MAY NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT LEFT VENTRICULAR PRELOAD*

1. PAWP is less than LVEDP.

Aortic regurgitation

Reduced left ventricular compliance (see number 3)

2. PAWP is greater than LVEDP.

When catheter tip is in Zone 1 or 2; may occur from artificial ventilation, with or without PEEP or from volume depletion

Atrial myxoma

Thoracic tumors pressing on pulmonary veins

Mitral stenosis or regurgitation

Increased left ventricular compliance (see number 3)

3. PAWP equals LVEDP, but LVEDP does not correlate with LVEDV.

Decreased left ventricular compliance Increased left ventricular compliance

Increased right ventricular volume Decreased right ventricular volume

Pericardial tamponade Removal of pericardium

Some drugs, e.g., isoproterenol Some drugs, e.g., nitroglycerin

High LVEDV Low LVEDV

Tachycardia Bradycardia

PEEP

Myocardial ischemia and infarction

Myocardial hypertrophy

*Ideal Situation--PAWP equals LAP equals LVEDP, and LVEDP is proportional to LVEDV. When this is true, PAWP can he used as a measure of left ventricular preload.

PITFALLS AND COMPLICATIONS IN HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING

There are probably more pitfalls and complications from use of Swan­Ganz catheterization than from any other technique mentioned in this book. Some of the potential pitfalls were discussed in the previous section on pulmonary artery wedge pressure. Pitfalls are errors in judgment or management; complications refer to problems with the technique itself. The box on p. 171 lists the common pitfalls and complications of this technique.

This list is by no means complete, but it does represent most of the problems likely to be encountered. Despite the potential for problems, one should not hesitate to use hemodynamic monitoring in the right situation. Properly used, hemodynamic monitoring (including arterial cannulation and blood gas analysis) can provide an accurate physiologic picture of critically ill patients.

PITFALLS AND COMPLICATIONS IN HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING

Pitfalls (errors in judgment or management)

1. Inappropriate indications (when less invasive methods are just as good and when data will not change therapy)

2. Obtaining data incorrectly (inaccurate machine calibration and incorrect transducer placement)

3. Misusing data (improper interpretation of data obtained)

4. Not checking all relevant or related data before making therapeutic decisions (data such as chest x­ray, serum albumin, and urine output)

5. Not removing catheter when hemodynamic data are no longer used or are no longer useful in patient management

Complications from the technique

1. Ruptured or torn pulmonary or tricuspid valve

2. Pneumothorax (usually from subclavian insertion)

3. Pulmonary thrombosis and hemorrhage. including rupture of pulmonary artery

4. Right­sided endocardial damage (including hemorrhage, thrombus, and infection)

5. Knotting or kinking of catheter

6. Thrombosis in venous site of insertion

7. Cardiac arrhythmias, including heart block

8. Infection at site of insertion or at catheter tip

9. Balloon rupture

10. Loss of guide wire or portion of catheter within the venous system

HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Table 8­5 shows typical hemodynamic changes in some common clinical conditions; these changes represent the ''pure" cases. Many patients have more than one problem, e.g., adult respiratory distress syndrome (discussed in Chapter 11) and leftsided heart failure. To make things even more complicated, pulmonary edema can be aggravated by low oncotic pressure.

Clinical problem 8
A 60­year­old diabetic woman is admitted to the hospital because of dehydration and a urinary tract infection. When admitted, her temperature is 100.7° F. Treatment is begun using antibiotics and intravenous fluids. On the morning of her third hospital day, she develops respiratory distress manifested by tachypnea, and her temperature rises to 102° F. Her blood pressure, normal on admission, falls to 88 mm Hg systolic. A chest x­ray film, also normal on admission, now shows bilateral infiltrates. She is transferred to the intensive care unit and a Swan­Ganz catheter is inserted through her right internal jugular vein. Initial measurements and calculations are as follows:

Pulmonary artery pressure 27 mm Hg systolic

12 mm Hg diastolic

21 mm Hg mean

Pulmonary artery wedge 7 mm Hg

pressure

Cardiac output 6.3 L/min

Cardiac index 4.1 L/min/m2

Systemic vascular resis­ 8.3 mm Hg/L/min

tance

How do you interpret these hemodynamic data?

Table 8­5. Some hemodynamic changes in common clinical conditions*
ConditionChest x­ray infiltrates SAPSVR QTPAPPAWP
Adult respiratory distress syndromeBoth sides VariableVariableVariable VariableNormal to decreased
Left­sided heart failureOne or both sides Normal to decreasedIncreased DecreasedIncreasedIncreased
Septic shockNone, one, or both sides DecreasedDecreasedIncreased Normal to decreasedNormal to decreased
DehydrationNoneDecreased IncreasedNormal to decreased Normal to decreasedDecreased
Pulmonary hypertensionNone NormalNormalNormal IncreasedNormal
*Many conditions overlap so that the typical hemodynamic changes may not manifest in an individual patient. For example. a patient with sepsis and heart failure may have decreased cardiac output; a patient with adult respiratory distress syndrome and heart failure may have an increased PAWP. SAP, systemic arterial pressure; SVR, systemic vascular resistance; QT, cardiac output; PAP. pulmonary arterial pressure; PAWP, pulmonary artery wedge pressure.

Clinical problem 9
A 68­year­old man is hospitalized following a cerebrovascular accident that has left him unable to speak or eat. The patient is alert and understands directions. His recovery is slowed by development of right lower lobe aspiration pneumonia: blood gas measurement shows a Pao, of 65 mm Hg while the patient is breathing nasal oxygen at 2 L/min. He is treated with intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and nasogastric feedings. but by the fourth hospital day his condition has deteriorated: his Pao, is now 55 mm Hg while breathing 50% oxygen through a face mask, and he is unresponsive. Portable chest x­ray shows bilateral infiltrates compatible with pneumonia. The patient is intubated and provided artificial ventilation.

At this point differential diagnosis includes bilateral pneumonia, adult respiratory distress syndrome. and congestive heart failure. A Swan­Ganz catheter and arterial line are placed and the following information is obtained:

Pulmonary artery pressures 35 mm Hg systolic

23 mm Hg diastolic

29 mm Hg mean

Systemic artery pressures 140 mm Hg systolic

72 mm Hg diastolic

100 mm Hg mean

Pulmonary artery wedge 22 mm Hg mean

pressure

Central venous pressure 10 mm Hg

Cardiac output 5.4 L/min

Cardiac index 3.1 L/min/m2'

Systemic vascular resis­ 19 mm Hg/L/min

tance

How do you interpret these data?

Clinical problem 10
A comatose 65­year­old man is brought to the emergency room. Initial blood gas analysis reveals marked respiratory acidosis, with pH of 7.05, Paco. of 86 mm Hg, and PaO2 of 36 mm Hg (FIO2 of 0.21). The patient is intubated and is transferred to the intensive care unit. His chest x­ray shows clear lung fields and a slightly enlarged heart. Because of his very small urine output and systemic hypotension, a Swan­Ganz catheter and an arterial cannula are placed in the patient.

Initial and subsequent hemodynamic data are shown below. During a 10­hr period, the patient received intravenous dextrose and saline at a rate of approximately 200 ml/hr. How do you interpret these data?

1 PM 3 PM 11 PM

Pulmonary arterial pressure (mm Hg) 53/26 50/25 48/24

Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mm Hg) 9 14 16

Systemic arterial pressure (mm Hg) 95/65 110/73 115/75

Cardiac output, L/min 4.5 4.8 5.1

Cardiac index, L/min/m2 2.7 2.8 2.9

Tidal volume (cc) 800 800 800

Respiratory rate/min 12 12 12

FIO2 0.50 0.40 0.40

pH 7.23 7.35 7.38

PaCO2 (mm Hg) 65 58 51

PaO2 (mm Hg) 123 90 94

[Table of Contents][Previous Chapter][Chapter 8, Page 1][Chapter 8, Page 2][Chapter 8, Page 3][Chapter 8, Page 5][Next Chapter]